Porque têm os USA de estar metidos sempre em tudo?

Desde a II guerra mundial que os USA não param de estar envolvidos em guerras, andam nelas há perto de 70 anos, sem interrupção, é claro que sempre movidos não pela defesa da liberdade e democracia, mas sim pelos seus interesses mesquinhos e das corporações de armamentos.

Mas porque o fazem?
Simplesmente pelo petróleo, a Venezuela dispõe de grandes reservas desse “mijo do diabo”.

Oil reserves

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

“According to the Oil and Gas Journal (OGJ), Venezuela has 77.2 giga barrels of proven conventional oil reserves (80 years of future production), the largest of any country in the Western Hemisphere. In addition it has non-conventional oil deposits similar in size to Canada’s – at 1,200 billion barrels approximately equal to the world’s reserves of conventional oil. About 267 billion barrels of this may be producible at current prices using current technology. [5] Venezuela’s Orinoco tar sands are less viscous than Canada’s Athabasca oil sands – meaning they can be produced by more conventional means, but are buried deeper – meaning they cannot be extracted by surface mining. In an attempt to have these extra heavy oil reserves recognized by the international community, Venezuela has moved to add them to its conventional reserves to give nearly 350 billion barrels of total oil reserves. This would give it the largest oil reserves in the world, even ahead of Saudi Arabia. In October 2007 the Venezuelan government said its proven oil reserves have risen to 100 billion barrels. The energy and oil ministry said it has certified 12.4 billion additional barrels of proven reserves in the country’s Faja del Orinoco region [6]

Não contentes com o estado de coisas da Venezuela, resolvem usar todos os truques baixos para destituir o actual presidente, quer se queira quer não, legítimo do país.
No mínimo o Chavez é mais legítimo que o actual presidente dos USA.

Para tal começaram as guerrinhas da CIA, nada que já não estejam habituados, de Timor Leste ao Chile, passando pelo Vietnam etc etc.

Se o fazem contra os seus próprios cidadãos, o que os impede de fazer tão ou pior em outros países?
Veja-se o caso das operações, chamadas de False Flag que ocorrem um pouco por todo o mundo, ou que foram estudadas para serem executadas:

operation gladio

“Gladio (Italian, from Latin gladius, meaning sword) is a code name denoting the clandestine NATOstay-behind” operation in Italy after World War II, intended to counter a Warsaw Pact invasion of Western Europe. Although Gladio specifically refers to the Italian branch of the NATO stay-behind organisations, Operation Gladio is the code name for all stay-behind organisations. Operating in all of NATO and even in some neutral countries or in Spain before its 1982 adhesion to NATO, Gladio was first coordinated by the Clandestine Committee of the Western Union (CCWU), founded in 1948. After the creation of NATO in 1949, the CCWU was integrated into the Clandestine Planning Committee (CPC), founded in 1951 and overseen by the SHAPE (Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe), transferred to Belgium after France’s official withdrawal from NATO in 1966 — which was not followed by the dissolution of the French stay-behind paramilitary movements. According to historian Daniele Ganser, one of the major researchers on the field, “Next to the CPC, a second secret army command center, labeled the Allied Clandestine Committee (ACC), was set up in 1957 on the orders of NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander in Europe (SACEUR). This military structure provided for significant US leverage over the secret stay-behind networks in Western Europe as the SACEUR, throughout NATO’s history, has traditionally been a US General who reports to the Pentagon in Washington and is based in NATO’s Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) in Mons, Belgium. The ACC’s duties included elaborating on the directives of the network, developing its clandestine capability, and organizing bases in Britain and the United States. In wartime, it was to plan stay-behind operations in conjunction with SHAPE. According to former CIA director William Colby, it was ‘a major program’.”[1]

The role of the CIA in sponsoring Gladio and the extent of its activities during the Cold War era, and its relationship to attacks perpetrated in Italy during the years of lead and other similar clandestine operations is the subject of ongoing debate and investigation. Italy, Switzerland and Belgium have had parliamentary inquiries into the matter.[2]“

vídeo da bbc

operation ajax

“In the 1953 Iranian coup d’état, the United Kingdom and the United States orchestrated the overthrow of the democratically-elected administration of Prime Minister Mohammed Mosaddeq and his cabinet from power. The support of the coup was carried out, using widespread bribery[1] in a covert operation by Kermit Roosevelt, Jr. for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). According to a report on the BBC, Britain, motivated by its desire to control Iranian oil fields, contributed to funding for the widespread bribery of Iranian officials, news media and others. The project to overthrow Iran’s government was codenamed Operation Ajax (officially TP-AJAX).[2] The coup re-installed Mohammad Reza Pahlavi in the primary position of power. In 2000, former U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, during the administration of President Bill Clinton, called it a “setback for democratic government” in Iran.[3]“

video aqui

operation northwoods

“Operation Northwoods
, or Northwoods, was a 1962 plan by the US Department of Defense to stage acts of simulated or real terrorism on US soil and against US interests and then put the blame of these acts on Cuba, so as to generate U.S. public support for military action against the Cuban government of Fidel Castro.

As part of the U.S. government’s Operation Mongoose anti-Castro initiative, the plan, which was not implemented, called for various false flag actions, including simulated or real state-sponsored acts of terrorism (such as hijacked planes) on U.S. and Cuban soil. The plan was proposed by senior U.S. Department of Defense leaders, including the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Lyman Louis Lemnitzer.”

video aqui

gulf of tonkin

“The Gulf of Tonkin Incident was an alleged pair of attacks by naval forces of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (commonly referred to as North Vietnam) against two American destroyers, the USS Maddox and the USS Turner Joy. The attacks were alleged to have occurred on 2 August and 4 August 1964 in the Gulf of Tonkin.

Later research, including a report released in 2005 by the National Security Agency, indicated that the second attack most likely did not occur, but also attempted to dispel the long-standing assumption that members of the administration of President Lyndon B. Johnson had knowingly lied about the nature of the incident. [1]

The outcome of the incident was the passage by Congress of the Southeast Asia Resolution (better known as the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution), which granted Johnson the authority to assist any Southeast Asian country whose government was considered to be jeopardized by “communist aggression”. The resolution served as Johnson’s legal justification for escalating American involvement in the Vietnam Conflict.”

a própria NSA fala do assunto

Pearl Harbor advance-knowledge debate

“The Pearl Harbor advance-knowledge debate is a dispute over what, if any, advance knowledge American officials had of Japan‘s December 7, 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor.

Ever since the Japanese attack there has been debate as to how and why the United States had been caught unaware, and how much and when American officials knew of Japanese plans and related topics. Several writers, including journalist Robert Stinnett and former United States rear admiral Robert Alfred Theobald, have argued that various parties high in the US and British governments knew of the attack in advance and may even have let it happen or encouraged it in order to force America into war via the “back door.” Evidence supporting this view is taken from quotations and source documents from the time and the release of newer materials.”

video aqui

USS Liberty incident

“The USS Liberty incident was an attack on a U.S. Navy signals intelligence ship, USS Liberty, in international waters about 12.5 nautical miles (23 km) from the coast of the Sinai Peninsula, north of the Egyptian town of El Arish, by Israeli fighter planes and torpedo boats on June 8, 1967. It occurred during the Six-Day War, a conflict between Israel and the Arab states of Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Iraq. The Israeli attack killed 34 U.S. servicemen and wounded at least 173. The incident remains controversial. Israel, and various U.S. government agencies, maintain the attack was an error, but American survivors of the attack, and others, dispute this.”

video aqui

The FBI Allowed the 1993 WTC Bombing to Happen

“THE NEW YORK TIMES

* * * * *

Thursday October 28, 1993 Page A1

“Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart
Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast”

By Ralph Blumenthal

Law-enforcement officials were told that terrorists were building a bomb that was eventually used to blow up the World Trade Center, and they planned to thwart the plotters by secretly substituting harmless powder for the explosives, an informer said after the blast.

The informer was to have helped the plotters build the bomb and supply the fake powder, but the plan was called off by an F.B.I. supervisor who had other ideas about how the informer, Emad Salem, should be used, the informer said.

The account, which is given in the transcript of hundreds of hours of tape recordings that Mr. Salem secretly made of his talks with law-enforcement agents, portrays the authorities as being in a far better position than previously known to foil the February 26th bombing of New York City’s tallest towers.”

Tens of Thousands Protest Chavez Proposals, Is CIA Fomenting Unrest to Challenge Referendum?

Now, what the memo talks about essentially is, first of all, the
effectiveness of their campaign against the constitutional amendments,
and it concedes that the amendment will be approved, but it does
mention the fact that they’ve reduced the margin of victory by six
percentage points. The second part is more interesting. It actually
mentions the fact that the US strategy is what they call a “pincer
operation.” That’s the name of the document itself. It’s—“pincer” is
“tenaza,” and it’s, first of all, to try to undermine the electoral
process, the vote itself, and then secondly, once the vote goes
through, if they are not able to stop the vote, is to engage in a
massive campaign calling fraud and rejecting the outcome that comes
from the election. So, on one hand, they’re calling a no vote, and on
the other hand, they’re denouncing the outcome if they lose.

Now, the other part that’s interesting about this document is what it
outlines as the immediate tasks in the last phase. And that includes
getting people out in the street, particularly the students. And
interestingly enough, there is a mixture here of extreme rightists and
some social democrats and even some ex-Maoists and Trotskyists.


CIA
Venezuela Destabilization Memo Surfaces

By JAMES PETRAS

“On November 26, 2007 the Venezuelan
government broadcast and circulated a confidential memo from the US embassy to the CIA which is devastatingly revealing of US clandestine operations and which will influence the referendum this Sunday, December 2, 2007.”

Powered by ScribeFire.

Seguir

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Junte-se a 67 outros seguidores