Etsuko Chida, uma alta comissária da ONU para os refugiados, UNHCR, que se encontrava em Kandahar a quando dos atentados veio a público afirmar que tinha muitas dúvidas sobre as versões oficiais dos atentados de 11 Set 2001.
Ela questiona a tese, conspiração oficial do 11Set2001, levantado questões como a Al-Qaeda de Bin Laden, o qual tem o alias de Tim Osmond na CIA, de terem sido criados e patrocinados por esta e que é benéfico para os EUA não o encontrarem ou capturarem.
Eis o vídeo com as declarações:
Below is our translation of an interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski. It is important for three reasons.
First, it flatly contradicts the official US justification for giving billions of dollars to the mujahideen in Afghanistan in the 1980s, namely that the US and Saudi Arabia were defending so-called freedom fighters against Soviet aggression.
Not so, says Brzezinski. He confirms what opponents have charged: that the US began covert sponsorship of Muslim extremists five months *before* the Soviets invaded Afghanistan. He says that after President Carter authorized the covert action:
“I explained to the president that this support would in my opinion lead to a military intervention by the Soviets.”
Second, the interview is instructive concerning so-called “conspiracy theory.” To be sure, there are plenty of nutty theories out there. And of course, there are plenty of just plain wrong theories. But as Brzezinski demonstrates, the US foreign policy establishment did, for want of a better word, conspire. Even as they claimed to oppose Muslim extremism, they knowingly fomented it *as a weapon of policy.* And they lied about what they were doing, pretending they were helping freedom fighters resist an invasion. In other words, deceit on two levels.
Powered by ScribeFire.
Filed under: Uncategorized |