Mais falcatruas dos amigos do Al Gore, Nova Zelândia e a ‘nossa’ TVI

Após ter aqui deixado umas pistas para leitura sobre o já chamado Climagate, que envolve ‘cientistas’ do Reino Unido, coloco com aspas porque estes senhores não merecem ser chamados de cientistas, agora é a vez de ‘cientistas’ da Nova Zelândia do «National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NiWA)», andarem a aldrabar dados para mais facilmente venderem a aldrabice do ‘Aquecimento Global’ ao qual agora designam por Alterações Climáticas, por forma a melhor enganarem o pessoal.

Relativamente à TVI, foi lamentável a todos os níveis o que se passou ontem na TVI24, segundo a qual iria haver um debate relativo a estas questões do bicho papão do ‘Aquecimento Global’ e do aumento do CO2.
Afinal de contas não passou de uma vergonhosa reunião de amigos do mentiroso Al Gore.

Compare and contrast these two graphs and you’ll see .

This is the graph from NiWA’s website, showing mean annual
temperature over New Zealand from 1853. Note the dotted straight line
showing the upward trend. Worrying, isn’t it? Almost enough to make you
fall in love your flickery, yellowy new eco-light bulbs, recycle your
kids and commit yourself to a binding agreement at Copenhagen.

Now have a look at this analysis of the raw data taken from exactly the same temperature stations.

Can you see the difference? I can – and I know as little about science as Al Gore.
[via http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/]

Nem sequer mencionaram nos seus noticiários este escândalo dos mails que vieram a público.
Pura propaganda, pura desinformação.
Onde está o contraditório?
Desde quando a ciência é dogma?
Vergonhoso este pseudo-jornalismo que a todos desinforma, criando receios, medos onde eles não existem.
Aliás, basta olhar para o que se tem passado nos meios de des(informação) com mais uma aldrabice, a da AH1N1 e tudo o que à sua volta gira como é o caso das vacinas.

Climategate: the scandal spreads, the plot thickens, the shame deepens… – Telegraph Blogs

We have discovered that the warming in New Zealand over the past 156 years was indeed man-made, but it had nothing to do with emissions of CO2—it was created by man-made adjustments of the temperature. It’s a disgrace.

NIWA claim their official graph reveals a rising trend of 0.92ºC per century, which means (they claim) we warmed more than the rest of the globe, for according to the IPCC, global warming over the 20th century was only about 0.6°C.
(…)
Manipulation of raw data is at the heart of recent claims of corrupt
scientific practice in climate science, with CRU’s Phil Jones recently
claiming old temperature records collected by his organization were
“destroyed” or “lost”, meaning researchers can now only access manipulated data.

TBR.cc: The Day The Science Died…:

We now all know – the entire industrialized world – that while global warming scientists and their supporters were publicly ridiculing skeptic’s arguments as “not peer reviewed” because – by implication – the arguments were not good enough, that in fact some of the top scientific advisors to the UN IPCC were conspiring (and that is the right word) to sabotage any attempt by other scientists to publish peer reviewed papers challenging global warming.

We now know the UN IPPC/Global Governance lobby had sufficient political clout to intimidate scientific journals into submission and to run roughshod over the integrity of the peer review process.

Powered by ScribeFire.