Pacheco Pereira sobre o implante de chips em humanos

Logo para acordar, resolvi dar uma olhada ao que havia de novo na blogosfera, usando para tal o big brother da web, o suposto “do no evil”, Google Reader, acabei por encontrar um post no Abrupto, o blog de J.Pacheco Pereira, que me deixou algo admirado.

O dr. Pacheco Pereira de uma maneira calma mas incisiva manifesta-se contra os implantes de chips em humanos, tal como eu e muitos por esse mundo fora temos vindo a chamar à atenção para o que o futuro nos reserva, um estado securitário, onde seremos totalmente vigiados e controlados através desses mesmos chips.

Tal como o dr. Pacheco Pereira afirma tudo “Começará como é costume, por um princípio de necessidade, depois de facilidade.”, para por fim acabar-mos “No século XX muitos humanos estiveram já marcados, como o gado, nos campos de concentração.”

Não sei é se o dr. Pacheco Pereira se apercebeu que ele contribui para que tal venha a acontecer quando passa a vida a dizer que vem lá o lobo, no que ao terrorismo concerne, quando na realidade grande parte do terrorismo, talvez mesmo a grande maioria, é terrorismo de estado, através de grupos criados artificialmente com vista a isso mesmo, criar um estado securitário usando para tal o medo e os media, através da Operação Mockingbird.

Um exemplo já clássico são as operações “False Flag” da CIA e NATO, Operação Gladio, Operação Northwoods, Operação Ajax, Gulf of Tonkin etc etc.

“We now turn to a structural analysis of modern false-flag terrorism of the type that is commonly sponsored by factions or networks embedded in the secret intelligence agencies of modern states. This discussion draws on the work of Andreas von Bülow, Gerard Wisnewski, Gianfranco Sanguinetti, and on my own research on the Moro assassination, the Red Brigades, and Italian terrorism in general.

“I’m just a patsy.”
Lee Harvey Oswald,
November 1963

The real authorship of state sponsored terrorism is to be successfully concealed, then a collection of scapegoats is the first ingredient required. These may be defined as the patsies, or alternatively as fall-guys, scapegoats, useful idiots, or dupes. It is necessary that they be of low mental ability and great gullibility, since their mission is to be part of false-flag groups which pretend to be working for a cause, such as the restoration of the caliphate, while in reality they are under the control of a private network inside the US government. It is vital for the terrorist controllers that the patsies not realize that this or that comrade in arms is actually a double agent, a provocateur working for the parallel CIA or some other complicit agency, or which more will be said later.
The best candidates for the patsy role are psychotics, psychopaths, or sociopaths. They may be fanatics bursting with criminal energy and criminal intent, or they may be pathetic ideologues and naifs. Frequently they are also misfits, bunglers, and generally maladroit in what they undertake.
According to research sponsored in 1999 by the Library of Congress, in a 1972 study “psychologist B.J. Berkowitz described six psychological types who would be most likely to threaten or try to use WMD: paranoids, paranoid schizophrenics, borderline
mental defectives, schizophrenic types, passive-aggressive personality types, and sociopath personalities. He considered sociopaths the most likely actually to use WMD.
Nuclear terrorism expert Jessica Stern disagreed. She believed that “Schizophrenics and sociopaths, for example, may want to commit acts of mass destruction, but they are less likely than others to succeed.” She pointed out that large-scale dissemination of chemical, biological, or radiological agents requires a group effort, but that “Schizophrenics, in particular, often have difficulty functioning in groups….” (Hudson)”

By Webster Griffin Tarpley