11Set2001 – 10 anos depois, só muda o número de guerras onde os EUA estão metidos

Confesso que não tenho seguido com muita atenção o tema do 11set2001 nos últimos tempos, mas como hoje faz 10 anos a que assistimos à maior False Flag da história da humanidade, deixo aqui alguns artigos recentes sobre o tema.


“I’m afraid, based on my own experience, that fascism will come to America in the name of national security”Jim Garrison

“They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security.”
Benjamin Franklin

Antes de mais um sentimento de pesar por todos os que faleceram e que espero estejam em paz bem como para as suas famílias que hoje passados 10 anos ainda continuam muitas delas a debaterem-se por uma investigação séria e credível sobre o que realmente sucedeu naquele dia.

E ainda uma palavra para com Danny Jowenko, um especialista em demolições controladas, que infelizmente faleceu recentemente vítima de um acidente de viação.

Começo por me questionar, porque raio tenho eu com os meus impostos e numa altura em que o actual desgoverno corta em tudo excepto no que deve, vai a RTP esbanjar milhares em directos a partir dos EUA apenas e só para vender a propaganda do medo das Administrações criminosas de Bush/Obama?!

Se já assistiram a alguns deles, por certo terão percebido que nada acrescentam, trata-se apenas de mais choradinho, sem qualquer pensamento critico sobre o que realmente se passou e muito menos sobre o verdadeiro ataque aos Direitos, Liberdades e Privacidade a que os cidadãos dos EUA, UE etc têm sido sujeitos, cada vez mais, desde essa data.

Mas é claro que a máquina de lavar cá do burgo, tem diversos programas de lavagem, a do bilderberger mor, Balsemão, é a das que mais branco lava!

Trailer do mais recente documentário do projecto AE911Truth.org

Architects & Engineers – Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 – AE911Truth.org

Obama Extends U.S. Perpetual State Of Emergency Due To The Terrorist Threat

The Special US “Visas for Terrorists” Program

The decade’s biggest scam

Exaggerating, manipulating and exploiting the Terrorist threat for profit and power has been the biggest scam of the decade; only Wall Street’s ability to make the Government prop it up and profit from the crisis it created at the expense of everyone else can compete for that titleNothing has altered the mindset of the American citizenry more than a decade’s worth of fear-mongering  So compelling is fear-based propaganda, so beholden are our government institutions to these private Security State factions, and so unaccountable is the power bestowed by these programs, that even a full decade after the only Terrorist attacks on U.S. soil, its growth continues more or less unabated.

You Only Believe the Official 9/11 Story Because You Don’t Know the Official 9/11 Story

During the past 10 years I have not met a single individual who, after doing research on the subjectpen, switched from questioning the official narrative of the events of 9/11/2001 to believing the official narrative of those events.. It is always the other way around. Why do you think that is? There are good reasons for this, and I will try to explain this phenomenon right now.”

10 Lies Enshrined by H.Res. 391 to “Never Forget” 9/11

The official version of the events of 9/11 are deemed written in stone according to a new 5-page House Resolution (pdf) which was passed to Never Forget 9/11.  The intention is great, in theory . . . the facts completely warped.

George Washington’s Blog: Continuity of Government Measures WERE Implemented on 9/11 . . . Were They EVER Revoked?

While I have no direct evidence that the COG is still in effect, the fact that key players have said that the measures would be permanent, the continuous exaggeration by the administration of major terrorist threats, and the circumstantial evidence that the COG measures are still in effect all argue for their continued existence.

[este artigo já tem algum tempo, mas com no vídeo acima se pode comprovar, tudo está na mesma, o COG mantém-se como indica Obama]

9/11: The day we lost our privacy and power [printer-friendly] • The Register

This is not a new structural problem in journalism or politics. It can make it hard for many to argue against the jibe that they have “nothing to hide”. This is never true, of course, but it leads an informed audience away from the central harm, which is that it is the existence of uncontrolled surveillance and (critically) the power to act on its results, that causes harm to society. This is the “chilling effect”. Fear, no more and no less.

Enhanced fear has now been common currency for a decade. It could be why – following Winston Smith, the central character of 1984 – that since 9/11 we may all be headed to a time why we don’t understand anymore why privacy matters.

Para quem ainda continua a acreditar que os governos/administrações seriam incapazes de matar os seus próprios cidadãos em ataques terroristas, relembro a Operação Gladio e os planos referentes à Operação Northwoods.

Operation Northwoods, the 1960s government plan to fake terrorist attacks on the U.S.

At the core of the 9/11 Truther movement is the idea that the government staged the attacks to drum up support for a war. So much Truther evidence is laughable that it’s easy to dismiss the idea, but there exists a chilling reminder that the U.S. military was once all-too-willing to deceive and attack its own citizens for political reasons. That was the goal of Operation Northwoods.

The Informants | Mother Jones

If this sounds vaguely familiar, it’s because such sting operations are a fixture in the headlines. Remember the Washington Metro bombing plot? The New York subway plot? The guys who planned to blow up the Sears Tower? The teenager seeking to bomb a Portland Christmas tree lighting? Each of those plots, and dozens more across the nation, was led by an FBI asset.”

9/11: When truth became a casualty of war

How did the 9/11 attacks impact the media?

New Documents Suggest DoD Watchdog Covered Up Intelligence Unit’s Work Tracking 9/11 Terrorists | Truthout

Senior Pentagon officials scrubbed key details about a top-secret military intelligence unit’s efforts in tracking Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda from official reports they prepared for a Congressional committee probing the 9/11 terrorist attacks, new documents obtained by Truthout reveal.

Moreover, in what appears to be an attempt to cover up the military unit’s intelligence work on al-Qaeda and Bin Laden prior to 9/11, a September 2008 Defense Department (DoD) Inspector General’s (IG) report that probed complaints lodged by the former deputy chief of the military unit in question, the Asymmetrical Threats Division of Joint Forces Intelligence Command (JFIC), also known as DO5, about the crucial information withheld from Congress, claimed “the tracking of Usama Bin Ladin did not fall within JFIC’s mission.””

Canadian psychology prof says there is basis for 9/11 conspiracy theories

“Floyd Rudmin, with the University of Tromso, says those labelled “conspiracy theorists” with regard to 9/11, the John F. Kennedy assassination or any number of other dramatic events have good reason to doubt the explanations given to the public by authorities.”


“Rudmin notes that many of the organizations of people who question what happened on Sept. 11, 2001, are experts in architecture, aviation and military. “These are not wackos. These are professional people.”


Remembering 9/11: 10 Years of War

Never heard of 9/11?

Equipa SEAL6 morre em queda de helicóptero – tão conveniente para o epílogo da fantasia oficial

Acabo de saber segundo diversas fontes, a não muito credível FoxNews, mas principalmente via o site Military.com/Associated Press, que um grande número de soldados da equipa SEAL6 que segundo a fantasia oficial terão assassinado Bin Laden, terão morrido na queda do helicóptero em que seguiam.

foto do helicóptero do ataque a ‘Bin Laden’

A NATO reconhece a queda do helicóptero que os guerrilheiros Taliban afirmam ter abatido com um rocket. Helicopter Crash in Afghanistan Reportedly Kills Members of SEAL Team 6

KABUL, Afghanistan — A military helicopter was shot down in eastern Afghanistan, killing 31 U.S. special operation troops, most of them from the elite Navy SEALs unit that killed Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, along with seven Afghan commandos. It was the deadliest single incident for American forces in the decade-long war.


One current and one former U.S. official said that the dead included more than 20 Navy SEALs from SEAL Team Six, the unit that carried out the raid in Pakistan in May that killed bin Laden. They were being flown by acrew of the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment. Both officials spoke on condition of anonymity because families are still being notified.

Uma notícia destas, a ser verdadeira, é sem dúvida extremamente conveniente para a história oficial que nos foi contada e que tem mais buracos que um passador. Recentemente a revista New Yorker escreveu sobre a fantasia oficial, presume-se que com o objectivo de terminar esta novela de Obama e sus muchachos.


P.S. a ser verdade esta notícia, não entraremos aqui também numa nova fábula? É que segundo uma testemunha, sr. Bashir, este indica que durante a suposta operação para assassinar Bin Laden, existiam 3 helicópteros, só um aterrou, após algum tempo este levantou novamente com os homens que haviam saído dele, presume-se que a tal Equipa SEAL6, mas ainda segundo a dita testemunha, este explodiu após a descolagem matando toda a gente a bordo.

Bin Laden…O fantoche (Tim Osman) Imortal da CIA!

Esta entrada já devia ter sido escrita há uns dias, mas a info não pára de chegar….agora é tanta queainda custa mais a escrever, mas cá vai…

Mais uma longa entrada para tentar resumir numa só, muita informação dispersa por diversos sites.
Como tenho escrito muito pouco por aqui, desta vez dá para ficar um mês a ler informação pertinente :)

A longa lista de artigos que usarei nesta entrada podem também ser consultados na minha feed do FriendFeed seguindo as #tags abaixo indicadas.

File:Osama bin Laden portrait.jpg
Ossama Bin Laden
via wikipedia

”We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality.” Andwhile you’re studying that reality-ju­diciously, as you will- we’ll actagain, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors… and you, all of you, will be left to study what we do.”Karl Rove

1 de Maio de 2011 foi a data que a intelligence dos EUA escolheu para ‘matar’, pela nona vez, o seu papão mor, Ossama Bin Laden [#OBL] ou como é conhecido nos cheques que a CIA passa, operacional Tim Osman.

Esta data segundo o muito interessante blog, The Vigilant Citizen, não foi escolhida por acaso, tratou-se de um ritual….à luz do dia, para que todos tomassem parte dele, ainda que não se tenham apercebido disso.

Why the Death of the Guy Who was not Behind 9/11 Was Announced on May 1st | The Vigilant Citizen

It is in times like these that a line is drawn between critical thinkers
and those who get swiped by media crap-storms; Between those who
understand the complexity of a situation and those who’d rather not
know; Between those who comprehend the underlying motives of the elite and those who go outside chanting “USA! USA!”.

We’re living in an era of artificial, fully staged, media-generated events.Why was Bin Laden’s death announced on the evening of May 1st?  Because it was the required sacrifice of the “most magical time of the year”, which was launched with the Royal Wedding.

Só passadas umas quantas horas é que tive conhecimento da nova longa metragem made in CIAwood,
sem no entanto ter ainda acesso à grande rede, limitei-me a pensar no
que os senhores do mundo (não os EUA, mas a elite que nos desgoverna)
teriam incumbido o seu fantoche, Obama, de nos vender.

The US government that told us that Saddam Hussein had “weapons of mass destruction” and “al Qaeda connections” and that Iran has nuclear missiles that require the US to ring Russia with anti-ballistic missile
systems, finally told us the truth for once.
Obama found Osama and had him murdered, apparently unarmed in his underwear, defended not by al Qaeda, “the best trained, most dangerous vicious killers on the planet,” but by two unarmed women.

As I offered previously, if you believe this, I have a bridge in Brooklyn that I can let you have for a cheap price.

Pensei mesmo para os meus botões que iria ser surpreendido (ironia) com dados concretos, verificados por entidades independentes e sem qualquer margem para dúvidas…
Afinal de contas como dizia o saudoso Carl Sagan….“Alegações extraordinárias exigem evidências extraordinárias.”

Mas não! ;)

Segundo Obama e seus acólitos, nós meros cidadãos do mundo, escravos da elite da NWO/Nova (Des)Ordem Mundial, tínhamos de acreditar no que os ‘nossos senhores’ nos estavam a contar, que OBL havia sido morto e o seu corpo deitado ao mar, supostamente com dois objectivos, cumprir a lei/tradição islâmica e não tornar o local onde supostamente fosse enterrado numa romaria….ah e parece que também não conseguiam arranjar no planeta inteiro um pedaço de terra onde o sepultar! Parece que se esqueceram, de não
sei…talvez quem sabe entregar o corpo à família?!!

Nesta nova teoria que segue muito o padrão da dos supostos
19 terroristas equipados com x-actos que conseguem ultrapassar uma
defesa de biliões de dólares, inclusive manter aviões de combate em
, só que desta vez em vez de Bush filho temos Obama a fazer as
honras da casa, temos de ter em atenção a perspectiva histórica de tudo
isto, para tal enumerarei no fim da entrada de acordo com cinco pontos
algumas realidades que precisam não ser esquecidas.

  • Al-Qaeda
  • Ossama Bin Laden (OBL)
  • False Flags / 911(11Set2001) / Mentiras de Estados
  • Vídeos e Imagens Falsos
  • Legalidade

No entanto relativamente aos últimos acontecimentos algumas questões se levantam logo;

Segundo a lei/tradição islâmica um corpo nunca deve ser sepultado no mar, excepto se a pessoa lá morre e não consegue ser recuperado o corpo ou se é mesmo impossível transportá-lo para terra.

Nenhum destes casos se verificou.

Was bin Laden’s killing and burial legal? – Features – Al Jazeera English

“Islamic law traditionally allows disposing of a corpse at sea only if the person dies on board ship and there is no possibility of getting the body to dry land before it decomposes,” Marion Katz, professor of Islamic law, gender and ritual at New York University, told Al Jazeera.

2ª As Administrações dos EUA não se têm preocupado em cumprir quaisquer
leis, particularmente a islâmica, muito menos de índole religioso, ético
ou até do
Direito Internacional, basta ver o que fizeram com Saddam Hussein ou com os prisioneiros e crianças que têm torturado e morto no Iraque e Afeganistão; não esquecendo os ataques com drones um pouco por todo o lado matando milhares de civis, inclusive no Paquistão.

Não é muito credível que de repente se comecem a preocupar.

Como é que os EUA poderiam enterrar o corpo ou entregá-lo à família quando com grande probabilidade não o têm uma vez que OBL terá morrido em finais de Dezembro de 2001 e terá sido enterrado em local incerto, segundo diversas notícias publicadas em jornais do Paquistão, Índia etc?!

Inclusive antes de ser assassinada, Benazir Bhutto afirmou que OBL havia sido morto anos antes.

Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive?

The objective evidence includes the following facts:

First, up until mid-December 13, 2001, the CIA had regularly been intercepting messages between bin Laden and his people. At that time, however, the messages suddenly stopped, and the CIA has never again intercepted a message.

Second, on December 26, 2001, a leading Pakistani newspaper published a story reporting that bin Laden had died in mid-December, adding: “A prominent official in the Afghan Taleban movement . . . stated . . . that he had himself attended the funeral of bin Laden and saw his face prior to burial.”

Third, bin Laden had kidney disease. He had been treated for it in the American Hospital in Dubai in July 2001, at which time he reportedly ordered two dialysis machines to take home. If you have ever wondered what bin Laden was doing the night before the 9/11 attacks, CBS News reported that he was being given kidney dialysis treatment in a hospital in Pakistan. And in January of 2001, Dr. Sanjay Gupta said – based on a video of bin Laden that had been made in either late November or early December of 2001 – that
he appeared to be in the last stages of kidney failure.

Tentam-nos fazer acreditar que OBL terá vivido durante anos ao lado de uma academia militar paquistanesa sem que a CIA com fortíssimas ligações aos serviços secretos paquistaneses ISI, soubesse do seu paradeiro até 1 de Maio de 2011.

Hamid Gul, ex-responsável pela intelligence paquistanesa, ISI, chama a tudo isto de “CIA “Choreographing” Osama Assassination Hoax“.

O coronel russo e analista militar, Evgeny Khrushchev, também é da opinião que a história contada por Obama e seus assessores parece um conto de fadas ensaiado.

“The area is only about a kilometre from Pakistan’s elite military training academy, and the Taliban frequently target such academies.”

via BBC

Story of Bin Laden’s death looks like staged fairytale – military analyst — RT

“It’s great news, if that’s true,” Khrushchev said referring to the news of the assassination of Osama Bin Laden. “But
it looks like a [highly] staged fairytale, first. And secondly, the United States hasn’t proved that the White House has iron-clad, video-taped evidence regarding the operation and how his body was
transferred to land-locked Afghanistan later, to be dumped at sea, with all those honors… [It] doesn’t make any sense for me.”

“That was not the reason,” Khrushchev said. “He was supposed to be brought for forensic [examination] back to the United States, because he was the main target of the ten-year-long

Querem ainda que acreditemos que ninguém na região sabia que um homem daquela importância vivia lá há anos.
Aliás é interessante de ouvir esta reportagem da BBC no local, onde é dito por alguém dessa região que supostamente lá vive há muitos anos, que quem os EUA supostamente assassinaram foi o seu vizinho Akhbar Khan (alguém sabe o significado deste nome?).

“His name is Akhbar Khan (Han), He owns the house……I know him very well” says his neighbor.
Only 1 in 50 locals questioned believe Bin Laden was really killed in
that house. Obama staged this whole scam with the Patreaus Panetta
Pakistani Pentagon CIA, that has been supplying the “Taliban” so the
Pentagon can run a fake war to keep rebuilding Afghaniistan for Hillary
Clinton and the CIA. The fake Nobel Peace Prize winner is really the
worlds greatest psychopathic liar covert warlord. His approval rating
is up, sheep. 9/11 was an inside job, and Obama is still doing it.
Source: Osama Bin Laden: Pakistan’s scepticism over videos (BBC)

Se de facto se tratava mesmo de OBL supostamente a mente por detrás dos atentados de 11et2001 embora até agora não tenha sido apresentada uma única prova que fosse, inclusive o FBI não possui evidência disso, Dana Perino ex-porta-voz da Casa Branca de Bush confirma que não foi OBL assim como o ex-Vice-Presidente Dick Cheney, não havia nenhuma razão para o assassinar, de facto existiam múltiplas razões para precisamente evitarem a todo o custo a sua morte, afinal de contas se essa pessoa era tão perigosa para os EUA havia que a apanhar viva, interrogá-la e para que todo o mundo soubesse que os EUA são um país onde a Justiça prevalece, deveriam julgar num Tribunal civil essa
pessoa, por forma a que os EUA pudessem apresentar provas da sua culpabilidade e a pessoa ter a hipótese de se defender dessas mesmas

Na verdade nunca foi objectivo dos EUA deterem e levarem a Tribunal OBL, o ex-número 3 da CIA terá mesmo afirmado que Bush o ajudou a escapar, isso implicaria virem a público muitas das histórias sobre a cumplicidade dos EUA na criação, treino e suporte financeiro bem como ligações a outros países (Arábia Saudita, Emiratos Árabes Unidos, Paquistão) destes grupos anteriormente designados e protegidos pelos media dos EUA, hoje terroristas para os mesmos media.
A mais recente utilização por parte dos EUA e NATO da base de dados dos guerrilheiros mujahadeen, Al-Qaeda, acontece precisamente na Líbia, mais uma vez os media mainstream chamam-lhes revolucionários….

Forgotten Coverage of Afghan ‘Freedom Fighters’
The villains of today’s news were heroes in the ’80s

The current war in Afghanistan is increasingly presented as a war for the human rights of the Afghan people, to liberate them from their oppressive Taliban rulers. The Taliban’s severely regressive policies toward women have received particular attention, with even First Lady Laura Bush issuing condemnations of this repression. And the press has overwhelmingly followed suit, portraying the war as an ideological struggle against the evils of Islamic extremism.

But the U.S. government and the American press have not always opposed Afghan extremists. During the 1980s, the Mujahiddin guerrilla groups battling Soviet occupation had key features in common with the Taliban.
In many ways, the Mujahiddin groups acted as an incubator for the
later rise of the Taliban in the 1990s.

7ª É sabido que OBLsofria de deficiência renal, necessitando mesmo de fazer diálise.
Até hoje não foi encontrada, ou pelo menos não nos foi dito que tivessem
encontrado uma máquina de diálise no local onde supostamente assassinaram OBL.

Conseguiram supostamente encontrar filmes porno (a ser verdade pergunto-me se não seriam usados para enviar mensagens codificadas/escondidas usando Steganografia) mas não uma máquina de diálise….estranhas prioridades!
É claro que encontrar uma máquina de diálise era chato para a versão oficial, afinal de contas colocaria-a em causa, já para não falar que daria credibilidade às notícias de OBL ter sido tratado no hospital americano do Dubai e de Rawalpindi no Paquistão.

CNN.com – Dr. Sanjay Gupta: Bin Laden would need help if on dialysis – January 21, 2002

(CNN) — Speculation about the whereabouts and health of Osama bin Laden picked up over the weekend when Pakistan’s president, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, said he thought bin Laden had likely died of kidney failure.

CNN medical correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta spoke Monday with CNN’s Paula Zahn about bin Laden’s appearance in recently released videotapes and
the possibility that the accused terrorist leader was undergoing kidney treatment.

Is Osama bin Laden Dying … Again? – TIME

In 2002, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf said bin Laden had kidney disease, and that he had required a dialysis machine when he lived in Afghanistan. That same year, the FBI’s top counterterrorism official, Dale Watson, said, “I personally think he is probably not with us anymore.
Now the CIA has produced a report saying that bin Laden has long-term kidney disease and may have only months to live, two U.S. officials familiar with the report told TIME. The agency ostensibly managed to get the names of some of the medications bin Laden is taking. One U.S. official familiar with the report, which came out between six and nine months ago, says it concluded, “Based
on his current pharmaceutical intake, [we] would expect that he has no more than six to 18 months to live and impending kidney failure.”

Colecção de filmes pornográficos encontrada na casa de Bin Laden – Mundo – PUBLICO.PT

Responsáveis norte-americanos confirmaram a descoberta de uma “quantidade considerável” de filmes, salientou o “The New York Times”, que poderiam pertencer ao líder da Al-Qaeda ou a outras pessoas que viviam na casa.
Não é uma descoberta pouco comum neste tipo de situações, sublinhou a Reuters a partir de relatos de três responsáveis norte-americanos que
pediram anonimato mas que acompanharam investigações relacionadas com outros militantes islamistas.

Muitos dos vídeos encontrados foram descarregados da Internet e estavam guardados num cofre no quarto de Bin Laden, adiantou a estação de televisão ABC.

Também é de notar estes interessantes dados que o jornal Público aqui nos deixa, “sublinhou a Reuters a partir de relatos de três responsáveis norte-americanos que pediram anonimato”, “Muitos dos vídeos encontrados foram descarregados da Internet”.
Sinceramente não consigo perceber como o jornal português, o NYTimes e a Reuters dão tanta credibilidade a “responsáveis norte-americanos que pediram anonimato”; caros jornalistas com fontes desse tipo as vossas notícias valem ZERO.

Parece que o ‘jornalismo’ de hoje em dia se limita ao copy/paste e ao disse que disse.

O outro ponto interessante é afirmarem que os supostos vídeos terão sido
descarregados da Internet, presumo que depois expliquem que foram
descarregados noutro lado que não o complexo onde supostamente OBL terá
sido assassinado, a não ser que mais uma vez a história que nos têm
vindo a contar tenha novamente mudado, o que convenhamos se está a
tornar um hábito.

A história à volta desta novela de baixo orçamento está constantemente a mudar.

Primeiro OBL estava armado e escondeu-se atrás de uma das suas mulheres, depois já não estava armado nem se escondeu atrás dela, depois uma das mulheres já não havia sido assassinada como primeiro afirmaram.

Primeiro afirmaram que houve batalha durante cerca de 40 minutos, por fim já
afirmam que os SEAL só mataram um homem quando aterraram no local e que
não dispararam mais durante o resto da operação….o que leva à questão,
se não dispararam mais, o suposto OBL não terá sido assassinado no

Agora parece que após o representante das Nações Unidas para os direitos humanos ter questionado a legalidade de semelhante operação, a Administração Obama resolveu deixar de tentar criar mais cenários.

Sibel Edmonds’ Boiling Frogs Post | Home of the Irate Minority

We went from armed Bin Laden using his wife as a shield to armed Bin Laden using an anonymous woman as a shield, to unarmed Bin Laden using some kind of a woman as a shield, and now, unarmed Bin Laden in pajamas using
no one as a shield!

But last night, the White House said Bin Laden was not armed when a U.S. Navy SEAL confronted and killed him during Sunday night’s assault on his compound.

Security officials said they did not recover any arms and explosives during their detailed search of the compound and the 13-roomed house, during which they removed two buffalos, a cow and around 150 chickens.

9ª Leon Panneta o número um da CIA, afirmou que durante vinte cinco minutos
enquanto decorria a operação não existiu qualquer transmissão de imagens
ou audio do que se passava no local da operação, o que levanta suspeitas sobre a famosa foto do staff da Casa Branca todo reunido à volta de….provavelmente um ecrã negro, ou quem sabe algumas filmagens da Sala Oval com Bill Clinton e a senhorita Monica pelo menos tendo em conta a expressão da sra Clinton ;)

Ah…já agora, parece que segundo a Casa Branca, a história da fotografia também já não é bem como a contaram num primeiro momento….

via ABC(Pete Souza/The White House)

Osama bin Laden dead: Blackout during raid on bin Laden compound – Telegraph

Leon Panetta, director of the CIA, revealed there was a 25 minute blackout during which the live feed from cameras mounted on the helmets of the US special forces was cut off.

A photograph released by the White House appeared to show President
Barack Obama and his aides in the situation room watching the action as
it unfolded.
In fact they had little knowledge of what was happening in the compound.

10ª E o que dizer da famosa fotografia em que supostamente aparecia OBL morto que os media ajudaram a propagandear mas que passada menos de uma hora já se sabia que era falsa…tendo no entanto enganado até três senadores.


No entanto para levar a cabo uma PSY-OP deste género o que conta são os primeiros minutos, as primeiras imagens como aliás mais uma vez se viu no caso dos atentados do WTC em 11Set2001 onde por certo um operacional deu o mote para a história da queda dos edificios ser devida ao embate dos aviões….até porque ainda hoje muita gente nem sabe que caiu um terceiro arranha-céus, o WTC7, sem que qualquer avião tivesse embatido neste.

Esses primeiros minutos são cruciais para levar o povão a acreditar na fantasia oficial que lhe estão a vender.

11ª Os valores apresentados pela Administração Obama para a casa onde
supostamente habitava OBL estão longe de ser o tal $US 1M de dólares,
segundo diversos especialistas que conhecem bem o mercado habitacional
daquela área,
a vivenda onde tudo decorreu, que de luxuosa muito pouco tinha, vale cerca de $US 250,000 dólares.

Osama bin Laden hideout ‘worth far less than US claimed’ | World news | guardian.co.uk

Osama bin Laden’s house, described by the US government as a $1m (£605,000) mansion, is in fact worth no more than $250,000 say property professionals in Abbottabad, the town where he was killed. The revelation is the latest of several erroneous descriptions about the nature of Bin Laden’s hideout – and the manner of his death – which have dogged the White House in recent days.
Asked about the American estimate, he chuckled. “Maybe that’s the assessment from a satellite. But here on the ground, that’s the price.”

12ª Foi-nos dito que uma das razões para o suposto OBL se ter mantido
incógnito durante anos naquela casa terá sido em virtude de não existirem meios de comunicação electrónicos como por exemplo acesso à rede Internet.

No entanto mais tarde as sempre anónimas fontes dizem-nos que foram encontrados telemóveis.

Cada dia que nasce, nasce com ele uma nova história.
E os media mainstream, especialmente os nossos, papam-nas todas sem um mínimo de esforço para as questionar.

Bin Laden ‘firefight’: Only one man was armed – World news – Death of bin Laden – msnbc.com

In fact, most of the operation was spent in what the military calls “exploiting the site,” gathering up the computers, hard drives, cellphones and files that could provide valuable intelligence on al-Qaida operatives and potential operations worldwide.

Como querem estes mentirosos/criminosos compulsivos que acreditemos em mais uma história que nem sequer seria verosimel num filme de baixo
orçamento, quando nos vêm mentido descaradamente amiúde, como se pode
facilmente comprovar com a história das armas de destruição massiva da
segunda invasão do Iraque, em que como já reconheceu, Collin Powell deliberadamente mentiu perante a Assembleia das Nações Unidas?! Ou como o demonstram no caso inglês, os Memos de Downing Street.

Como querem que acreditemos em mais esta farsa, quando na primeira invasão
do Iraque, quando haviam dado permissão ao Iraque para atacar o Kuwait,
vieram a público com a vil mentira de que os iraquianos estavam a matar
crianças em incubadoras?! Nada disso sucedeu como hoje se sabe, o que
sucedeu é que os EUA e os senhores do Kuwait,
pegaram na filha do embaixador Kuwaitiano, Nayirah al-Ṣabaḥ
e colocaram-na frente às câmaras a fazer a actuação da sua vida, digna
de óscar, mentindo descaradamente sobre algo que nunca se passou, a tal
história dos bebés e das incubadoras.

Mais, como quer a Administração Obama ou outra, fazer-nos acreditar em mais esta história mirabolante quando nos mentiram
repetidamente sobre a história da soldado Jessica Lynch, do jogador de
futebol americano Pat Tillman e da britânica Linda Norgrove?

US military’s history of backtracking on initial reports | World news | The Guardian

The only problem with the official account is that it was untrue. In fact, Lynch’s gun jammed and she did not fire a shot; Iraqi hospital staff treated her kindly and tried to return her to US forces; and, there was no need for a raid by army rangers and navy seals as the Iraqi military had fled the day before. Nor, contrary to initial reports, had
she been shot or stabbed – her injuries had been caused after her truck was hit and crashed.

In 2002, moved by the devastation of 9/11, Pat Tillman gave up a lucrative career in American football to enlist in the US army.

Despite the initial suggestion that he died “in the line of devastating enemy fire”, he was killed by his own side. His family was not told the truth about how he died until five weeks after his memorial service was broadcast on national TV.

In a biography published two years ago, it was claimed Tillman regarded his president as a cowboy who had led the country into an illegal and unjust war in Iraq. Tillman had noted in his diary his suspicion that the rescue of Jessica Lynch was “a media blitz”.


Until the killing of the al-Qaida chief, the most recent inaccurate account of a high-profile incident came last October, with the botched mission to free the kidnapped British aid
Linda Norgrove.

Members of Seal Team 6 – the special forces unit that killed Bin Laden – were sent to rescue Norgrove from eastern Afghanistan but one of them accidentally killed her by throwing a fragmentation grenade close to where she was sheltering.

13ª Um especialista em DNA de Forth Worth, Bruce Budowle (DNA expert and professor in the University of North Texas Health Health Science Center’s Department of Forensic and Investigative Genetics and executive director of the Institute of Investigative Genetics), afirma que não foram divulgados pelos EUA quaisquer dados relativos às supostas análises ao DNA de OBL e que os dados apresentados pelos media não são verdadeiros.

Existem ainda diversas questões e problemas relativos a este tipo de identificação.

Segundo o mesmo especialista 99,99% de certeza só é possível com DNA da própria pessoa (sangue ou saliva), ou seja a Administração dos EUA teria de
possuir uma amostra de DNA de OBL para agora comparar, algo muito
provável tendo ele sido um operacional da CIA, ou então recorrendo ao
maior número possível de familiares, algo bem mais complexo uma vez que
não creio que os familiares estejam dispostos a tal, ainda por cima para
aumentarem as probabilidades de confirmação necessitam ser familiares o
mais chegados possível, tipo irmãos etc.

De qualquer forma do ponto de vista de apresentar ao mundo provas
concretas e independentes, mesmo recorrendo a supostas análises de DNA, a
única maneira de o fazer é tendo o corpo, no entanto a primeira coisa
que fizeram foi verem-se livres dele.

Como tal é impossível verificar de forma independente os dados que a Administração Obama venha a apresentar.

Aliás, por essa razão o filho de OBL, Omar, afirmou que “We are not convinced on the available evidence in the absence of [a] dead body,”

Omar Bin Laden foi ainda mais longe questionando a razão pela qual o seu pai
supostamente terá sido assassinado, ainda para mais quando estava desarmado, tendo os EUA violado os mais básicos principios e leis
internacionais, usando força não justificada.

Tendo supostamente OBL cometido crimes em diversos países este deveria ter
sido detido e presente a um Tribunal Internacional para ser julgado.

Escusado será dizer que isso os EUA nunca poderiam permitir, uma vez que se
viria a conhecer muita informação que as Administrações de Carter a Obama querem é esconder, fazer desaparecer para sempre.

Recomendo a leitura do artigo do Bruno Fehr, onde ele foca alguma destas questões, especialmente as muitas dúvidas colocadas pelos media mainstream da Alemanha.

14ª E dando continuidade ao patrocínio e treino de supostos grupos
terroristas que na realidade não passam de ferramentas da elite que nos
controla, a Administração Obama prepara-se para substituir o seu antigo
lobo mau, por outro operacional dos seus quadros….
Anwar al-Awlaki, que por incrível que possa parecer a quem come tudo o que lhe vendem, esteve presente num jantar no Pentágono!

» Pentagon Dinner Guest al-Awlaki Slated to Replace Osama Alex Jones’ Infowars: There’s a war on for your mind!

He also dined at the Pentagon, according to documents obtained by Fox News. “The Pentagon has offered no explanation of how a man, now on the CIA kills or capture list, ended up at a special lunch for Muslim outreach,” a flummoxed Fox News reported.

“Awlaki was vetted before he was invited to attend a luncheon at the Pentagon in the secretary of the Army’s Office of Government Counsel. His appearance at the meeting was deliberately engineered despite Awlaki’s ties to three of the alleged 9/11 hijackers – Nawaf al-Hazmi, Khalid al-Mihdhar and Hani Hanjour – who were identified as the suicide pilots that slammed Flight 77 into the Pentagon,” Paul Joseph Watson wrote on October 21, 2010.

“Given the fact that Awlaki is a double operative, claiming to be an Al-Qaeda
leader yet in fact working for U.S. intelligence, it’s hardly surprising that he made an appearance at the Pentagon.”

O que é preocupante nisto tudo é a mensagem que os media mainstream vão tentando passar, que Questionar-mos os nossos governantes é crime e que a Ignorância é uma benção!

A parte principal da entrada que eu queria escrever sobre mais esta encenação made in CIAwood, termina aqui.

A seguir deixo mais informação que ajuda a perceber um pouco melhor tudo o
que acima acabo de mencionar, digamos que é um contexto histórico e
legal sobre o tema….recomenda-se a leitura e acima de tudo dar olhada
aos links que têm muita e interessante informação.

Aqui fica o link para um pdf com os links que fui guardando e um ficheiro comprimido com os artigos (recomendo que usem o 7zip para o abrir; já agora usei o Wget para obter esses dados ; $wget -i <ficheiro com links>)…ficará para mais tarde!

  • Al-Qaeda
  • Ossama Bin Laden (OBL)
  • False Flags / 911(11Set2001) / Mentiras de Estados
  • Vídeos e Imagens Falsos
  • Legalidade

* Sabe-se que desde finais dos anos 70 os EUA, Arábia Saudita, Emiratos Árabes Unidos e Paquistão suportaram, treinaram e fomentaram a formação de grupos que naquela altura eram chamados de Guerrilheiros mas que hoje dá jeito a estes mesmos países chamarem de terroristas, ainda que os continuem a usar, treinar e até colocar nos mais diversos e díspares campos de batalha, do médio oriente, passando pela Ásia e acabando na Europa.

Ainda há pouco tempo Hillary Clinton confirmou numa entrevista que os EUA tinham criado e suportado diversos destes grupos.

Também há não muito tempo, Alain Chouet, “former head of the Security Intelligence Service of the DGSE (Directorate-General for External Security” (o ex-responsável francês da intelligence), afirmou que aquilo a que designavam por Al-Qaeda desapareceu em 2002.

Sobre o tema recomendo que oiçam estas duas intervenções (audio mp3), a de Paul Thompson [mais] (criador do excelente site History Commons) e a de Nafeez Ahmed Mossadeq [mais...mais] (investigador inglês)

* Zbigniew Bzrezinski em entrevista ao jornal francês Le Nouvel Observateur descreve a razão pela qual criou os guerrilheiros mujahadeen, para forçar a entrada da ex-URSS no Afeganistão e assim dar-lhes um Vietnam.

Destruindo por completo um país que até à época tinha um padrão de vida semelhante ao europeu e onde se ouvia rock&roll e as mulheres podiam andar de cara destapada e frequentar a universidade.

No Regrets: Carter, Brzezinski and the Muj

Brzezinski: Yes.
According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the
reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.

Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?
Brzezinski: It isn’t quite that. We didn’t push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.

* Na verdade o que os EUA designam por Al-Qaeda nada tem a ver com o que Robin Cook, ex-secretário de Estado do UK escreveu num artigo do Guardian, para este Al-Qaeda é a base de dados dos guerrilheiros mujahadeen criada pela CIA para combater os Soviéticos.
Para os EUA essa designação apenas se deveu à necessidade em 2001 de
atribuir um nome para que legalmente se pudesse processar os ‘responsáveis’ pelos ataques de 1998 nas embaixadas de
Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya, como é explicado no documentário da BBC de Adam Curtis, The Power of Nightmares.

C.I.A. no al-qaeda ever existed – BBC documentary “the power of nightmares” | Polidics.com

BBC’s killer documentary called “The Power of Nightmares“. Top CIA officials openly admit, Al-qaeda is a total and complete fabrication, never having existed at any time. The Bush
administration needed a reason that complied with the Laws so they could go after “the bad guy of their choice” namely laws that had been set in place to protect us from mobs and “criminal organizations” such as the Mafia. They paid Jamal al
Fadl, hundreds of thousands of dollars to back the U.S. Government’s story of Al-qaeda, a “group” or criminal organization they could “legally” go after.

James Corbettcriou um site onde através de um pequeno documentário nos dá a conhecer a construção do mito Al-Qaeda.

Maktab al-Khidamat – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Maktab al-Khidamat, also Maktab Khadamāt al-Mujāhidīn al-’Arab, also known as the Afghan Services Bureau, is reliably[citation needed] believed to have been founded in 1984 by Abdullah Azzam and Osama bin Laden to raise funds and recruit foreign mujahidin for the war against the Soviets in Afghanistan. MAK became the forerunner to al-Qaeda and was instrumental in creating the fundraising and recruitment network that benefited al-Qaeda during the 1990s.
MAK established recruitment and fundraising offices in many Western countries, the United States being one of their main fund-raising destinations. The first offices in the United States were established within the Al Kifah Refugee Center in Brooklyn, and at the Islamic Center in Tucson, Arizona. On his fundraising tours Sheikh Abdullah Azzam visited the mosques of “Brooklyn, St. Louis, Kansas City, Seattle, Sacramento, Los Angeles, and San Diego – altogether there were 33 cities in America that opened branches of bin Laden and Azzam’s organization, the Services Bureau, in order to support the jihad.”

Al Qaeda: The Database.

Shortly before his untimely death, former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook told the House of Commons that “Al Qaeda” is not really a terrorist group but a database of international mujaheddin and arms smugglers used
by the CIA and Saudis to funnel guerrillas, arms, and money into Soviet-occupied Afghanistan.

In Arabic, the files were called, ‘Q eidat il-Maaloomaat’ and ‘Q eidat i-Taaleemaat.’ Those two files were kept in one file called in Arabic ‘Q eidat ilmu’ti’aat’ which is the exact translation of the English word database. But the Arabs commonly used the short word Al Qaida which is the Arabic word for “base.” The military air base of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia is called ‘q eidat ‘riyadh al ‘askariya.’ Q eida means “a base” and “Al Qaida” means “the base.”

“In the mid-1980s, Al Qaida was a database located in computer and dedicated to the communications of the Islamic Conference’s secretariat.


In yet another example of what happens to those who challenge the system, in December 2001, Maj. Pierre-Henri Bunel was convicted by a secret French military court of passing classified documents that identified potential NATO bombing targets in Serbia to a Serbian agent during the Kosovo war in 1998. Bunel’s case was transferred from a civilian court to keep the details of the case classified. Bunel’s character witnesses and psychologists notwithstanding, the system “got him” for telling the truth about Al Qaeda and who has actually been behind the terrorist attacks commonly blamed on that group. It is noteworthy that that Yugoslav government, the government with whom Bunel was asserted by the French government to have shared information, claimed that Albanian and Bosnian guerrillas in the Balkans were being backed by elements of “Al Qaeda.” We now know that these guerrillas were being backed by money provided by the Bosnian Defense Fund, an entity established as a special fund at
Bush-influenced Riggs Bank and directed by Richard Perle and Douglas Feith.

Robin Cook: The struggle against terrorism cannot be won by military means | UK news | The Guardian

Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by western security agencies. Throughout
the 80s he was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally “the database”, was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians.
Inexplicably, and with disastrous consequences, it never appears to have occurred to Washington that once Russia was out of the way, Bin Laden’s organisation would turn its attention to the west.

Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed: Our terrorists | MuslimMatters.org

Once upon a time, the CIA trained, financed and supported Osama bin Laden and his mujahidin networks in Afghanistan to repel the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. After the end of the Cold War, bin Laden turned against the West and we no longer had any use for him. His persistent terrorist attacks against us for more than a decade, culminating in 9/11, provoked our own response, in the form of the ‘War on Terror’. This is the official narrative. And it’s false. Not only did Western intelligence services continue to foster Islamist extremist and terrorist groups connected to al-Qaeda after the Cold War; they continued to do so even after 9/11.

Complete 911 Timeline: Al-Qaeda in the Balkans

In March 2002, authorities in Bosnia, Sarajevo, will raid the offices of the Benevolence International Foundation (BIF) due to suspected funding of al-Qaeda (see March 2002). The raid will uncover a handwritten list containing the name of twenty wealthy donors sympathetic to al-Qaeda. The
list, referred to as “The Golden Chain,” contains both the names of
the donors and the names of the recipients (but does not mention amounts given). Seven of the payments are made to Osama bin Laden.

The Bush Regime’s Imperial Affirmation: Endless War, Endless Conquest, Endless Repression

One need only review the role played by al-Qaeda in the Balkans during the 1990s when the United States and their NATO allies, particularly Germany and the United Kingdom, provided entrée to demobilized Afghan-Arab mujahedin fighters as the West dismembered the Socialist
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, culminating in 1999 with NATO’s murderous 78-day bombing campaign of Serbia to “liberate” Kosovo.

Earlier in the decade, thousands of Islamist fighters flooded
Bosnia-Herzegovina, directly recruited by former Waffen SS Handzar Division foot soldier and Islamist ideologue, Alia Izetbegovic, the President of Bosnia and darling of liberal interventionists such as Bernard-Henri Lévy. In calling for Western intervention, Lévy shamelessly described Izetbegovic’s neofascist statelet as an exemplar of “modern, secular Islam”! Quite naturally, Izetbegovic’s Nazi past was covered-up by Western interventionists intent on smashing multiethnic Yugoslavia into smithereens.

Indeed, intelligence analyst and senior lecturer at the University of
Amsterdam, Cees Wiebes, documents in Intelligence and the War in Bosnia 1992-1995, how Western intelligence agencies, including the CIA, MI6 and BND assisted major arms transshipments into Bosnia despite a UN arms embargo, often in concert with the reactionary Iranian regime.

Some estimates claim that by 1994, as many as 4,000 mujahedin fighters were present in Bosnia. Indeed, none other than Osama bin Laden himself visited Izetbegovic in Sarajevo. As a gesture of appreciation for his support, Izetbegovic gave bin Laden a Bosnian passport. And, a November 1, 2001 account in the European edition of The Wall Street Journal claimed that bin Laden continued to visit the Balkan region as late as 1996.

By 1995 as Wiebes documented, American Hercules C-130 transport planes accompanied by jet fighters began landing at the Tuzla Air Base in eastern Bosnia laden with arms, ammunition and communications equipment destined for Izetbegovic’s Islamist brigades. Similar arms pipelines were opened between Albania, Bosnia, Croatia and later in the decade Kosovo, where Albanian narcotrafficking networks rule the roost and continue to wreck havoc across the region.

E hoje em dia a barbárie continua….Kosovo PM is head of human organ and arms ring, Council of Europe reports

Kosovo PM is head of human organ and arms ring, Council of Europe reports | World news | The Guardian

Kosovo’s prime minister is the head of a “mafia-like” Albanian group responsible for smuggling weapons, drugs and human organs through eastern Europe, according to a Council of Europe inquiry report on organised crime.

Hashim Thaçi is identified as the boss of a network that began operating
criminal rackets in the runup to the 1998-99 Kosovo war, and has held
powerful sway over the country’s government since.

The report of the two-year inquiry, which cites FBI and other intelligence sources, has been obtained by the Guardian. It names Thaçi as having over the last decade exerted “violent control” over the heroin trade. Figures from Thaçi’s inner circle are also accused of taking captives across the
border into Albania after the war, where a number of Serbs are said to
have been murdered for their kidneys, which were sold on the black

Ossama Bin Laden (OBL)
via FBI

FBI — Most Wanted Terrorists

Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998, bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. These attacks killed over 200 people. In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world.

Bin Laden is left-handed and walks with a cane.

* Como se pode ler no site do FBI, bem como por declarações de responsáveis do Bureau [Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI], OBL nunca foi acusado ou procurado pelos atentados de 11Set2001, como acima refiro, quer Dana Perino quer Dick Cheney confirmam que este não tem ligação aos atentados nos EUA, assim como um ex-agente da CIA, no entanto a história continua a ser repetida vezes sem conta.

Para além de não existir evidência concreta que ligue OBL aos atentados, este numa entrevista pouco ou nada conhecida ou pelo menos nunca mencionada pelos media mainstream ocidentais, nega qualquer envolvimento nos atentados de 11Set2001.

FBI says, it has “No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11”

On June 5, 2006, the Muckraker Report contacted the FBI Headquarters, (202) 324-3000, to learn why Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11. The Muckraker Report spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”

Surprised by the ease in which this FBI spokesman made such an astonishing
statement, I asked, “How this was possible?” Tomb continued, “Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11.” I asked, “How does that work?” Tomb continued, “The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice than decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, Bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been
formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connected Bin Laden to 9/11.”

Did Osama bin Laden Confess to the 9/11 Attacks, and Did He Die, in 2001?

I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks.”

No artigo acima da autoria de David Ray Griffin, são analisados ainda, diversos supostos vídeos e declarações proferidas por OBL.

Osama bin Laden Responsible for the 9/11 Attacks? Where is the Evidence?

The idea that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the 9/11 attacks has been an article of faith for public officials and the mainstream media. Calling it an “article of faith” points to two features of this idea. On the one hand, no one in these circles publicly challenges this idea.

On the other hand, as I pointed out at length in two of my books – 9/11 Contradictions1 and The New Pearl Harbor Revisited,2 no good evidence has ever been publicly presented to support it.

Colin Powell’s Withdrawn Promise Two weeks after 9/11, Secretary of State Colin Powell, speaking to Tim Russert on Meet the Press, said that he expected “in the near future . . . to put out . . . a document that will describe quite clearly the evidence that we have linking [bin Laden] to this attack.”

Powell reversed himself, however, at a press conference with President Bush in the White House Rose Garden the next morning, saying that, although the government had information that left no question of bin Laden’s responsibility, “most of it is classified.”4 According to Seymour Hersh, citing officials from both the CIA and the Department of Justice, the real reason for
the reversal was a “lack of solid information.”

This was the week that Bush, after demanding that the Taliban turn over bin Laden, refused their request for evidence that bin Laden had been behind the attacks.6 A senior Taliban official, after the US attack on Afghanistan had begun, said: “We have asked for proof of Osama’s involvement, but they have refused. Why?”7 Hersh’s answer was that they had no proof.
Blair’s report, however, began by saying: “This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Osama Bin Laden in a court of law.” Although the case was not good enough to go to court, Blair seemed to be saying, it was good enough to go to war.

The weakness in Blair’s report, in any event, was noted the next day by the BBC, which said: “There is no direct evidence in the public domain linking Osama Bin Laden to the 11 September attacks. At best the evidence is circumstantial.”

* Diversos chefes de Estado e e respeitados oficiais da intelligence quer em privado quer publicamente afirmaram que OBL teria falecido à quase uma década.

Interview with Osama bin Laden. Denies his Involvement in 9/11

We bring to the attention of our readers the following text of Osama bin
Laden’s interview with Ummat, a Pakistani daily, published in Karachi on September 28, 2001.
It was translated into English by the BBC World Monitoring Service and made public on September 29, 2001.
The authenticity of this interview, which is available in recognized electronic news archives, is confirmed.
Osama bin Laden categorically denies his involvement in the 9/11 attacks.
Bin Laden’s statements in this interview are markedly different from those made in the alleged Osama video tapes.
In this interview, Osama bin Laden exhibits an understanding of US foreign policy. He expresses his views regarding the loss of life on 9/11. He also makes statements as to who, in his opinion, might be the likely
perpetrator of the September 11 attacks.

This is an important text which has not been brought to the attention of Western public opinion.
I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States.
As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children, and other humans as an appreciable act.
Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children, and other people.
Whoever committed the act of 11 September are not the friends of the American people. I have already said that we are against the American system, not against its people, whereas in these attacks, the common American people have been killed.

According to my information, the death toll is much higher than what the US government has stated. But the Bush administration does not want the panic to spread. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the US system, but are dissenting against it.
They needed an enemy. So, they first started propaganda against Usamah and Taleban and then this incident happened. You see, the Bush administration approved a budget of 40bn dollars. Where will this huge amount go? It will be provided to the same agencies, which need huge funds and want to exert their importance.
Usamah: I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We are against the system, which makes other nations slaves of the United States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic freedom.
The Western media is unleashing such a baseless propaganda,
which make us surprise but it reflects on what is in their hearts and gradually they themselves become captive of this propaganda. They become afraid of it and begin to cause harm to themselves. Terror is the most dreaded weapon in modern age and the Western media is mercilessly using it against its own people.

* OBL em 1993 visita a Bósnia a convite do Presidente Izetbegovic

* Em Julho de 2001 recebe tratamento (diálise) no Hospital Americano do Dubai e encontra-se com o representante da CIA, segundo o jornal francês Le Figaro a France Presse e o London Times.

* Setembro de 2001 terá estado internado no hospital de Rawalpindi no Paquistão onde terá tido mesmo protecção das forças paquistanesas.

False Flags / 911(11Set2001) / Mentiras de Estados

Como venho neste blog escrevendo, historicamente os Estados têm cometido ou
planeado os mais diversos atentados terroristas contra os seus próprios cidadãos e atribuindo as culpas aos seus inimigos (muitas vezes
imaginários) por forma a levar a cabo a sua agenda, que como é óbvio
nunca é no interesse dos seus cidadãos.

Se não quiserem ler tanto, assistam ao documentário Terror Storm Full length version de Alex Jones.

Alguns exemplos dessas mentiras já as havia mencionado nesta entrada “Porque não atacam os supostos terroristas quem exerce as políticas que eles dizem abominar?”
Exemplos como a Operação Gladio na Europa (incluindo Portugal) durante a guerra fria, os documentos Northwoods
que previam o abate de um avião comercial dos EUA por forma a atribuir a
culpa a Cuba por forma a terem a desculpa para a invadir, etc etc.

* Em 1993 o World Trade Center sofreu o seu primeiro atentado, mais uma vez a culpa foi atribuída a supostos grupos terroristas muçulmanos.
Felizmente que o suposto líder do grupo que iria levar a cabo a operação após se ter arrependido, resolveu contactar ao FBI durante a preparação do
atentado tendo a feliz ideia de gravar todas as conversas que teve com os agentes, ficámos assim a conhecer a cumplicidade do FBI uma vez que foram agentes do Bureau que entregaram aos supostos terroristas a bomba que viria a explodir, tudo isto é hoje do conhecimento público até porque a CBS fez uma
interessante reportagem sobre o tema.

WTC 1993
– Corbett Report

Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast – New York Times

Law-enforcement officials were told that terrorists were building a bomb that was eventually used to blow up the World Trade Center, and they planned to thwart the plotters by secretly substituting harmless powder for the explosives, an informer said after the blast.

The informer was to have helped the plotters build the bomb and supply the fake powder, but the plan was called off by an F.B.I. supervisor who had other ideas about how the informer, Emad A. Salem, should be used, the informer said.

The account, which is given in the transcript of hundreds of hours of tape recordings Mr. Salem secretly made of his talks with law-enforcement agents, portrays the authorities as in a far better position than previously known to foil the Feb. 26 bombing of New York City’s tallest towers. The explosion left six people dead, more than 1,000 injured and damages in excess of half a billion dollars. Four men are now on trial in Manhattan Federal Court in that attack.

* A wikipedia tem um interessante artigo com as diversas mentiras vendidas aos cidadãos dos EUA e não só, relativas às invasões do Iraque em 1991 e em 2003 – Public relations preparations for 2003 invasion of Iraq

Nesse artigo podemos ler como em 1991 a Administração Bush pai com os impostos dos cidadãos dos EUA, pagou à firma Hill & Knowlton para que esta criasse a fantasia que acima mencionei, onde usando a filha do embaixador do Kuwait nos EUA
se vendeu a história de que os soldados iraquianos teriam entrado num
hospital e morto os bebés que se encontravam nas incubadoras.

Tudo isto sabe-se hoje que é FALSO, que não passou de mais uma PSYOP, propaganda.

Barry Zwicker – Gulf War 1 Lies – Babies Thrown From Incubators

Pode-se ler ainda como em 2003 voltaram a contratar outra empresa de relações públicas, Rendon Group para mais uma vez venderem uma guerra ao seu povo e resto do mundo, incluindo desta vez as fantasias das armas de destruição massiva bem como as supostas ligações entre Saddam Hussein e OBL, mais uma vez nada disto era verdade, inclusive como já mencionei, Collin Powell reconheceu que mentiu.

* Histórias da carochinha para manter o apoio dos cidadãos dos EUA a estas guerras injustas repetem-se amiúde como acima referi quando mencionei os casos da soldado Jessica Lynch etc.

Vídeos e Imagens Falsos

Embora já tendo deixado links para algumas destas mentiras, aqui ficam mais alguns que nos devem fazer pensar e questionar tudo o que nos tentam vender, especialmente quando nos chega a partir dos media maintream que se limitam a veicular as mentiras dos diversos Governos.

* As diversas supostas tapes de OBL bem como diversos vídeos, assim como as mais recentes fotos quer dele quer a da Administração Obama.

* De qual OBL se falava? Quantos é que afinal existiam?

* Diversos vídeos criados pela intelligence militar e a CIA para as sua PYOPS por forma a destruir e descredibilizar os seus supostos ‘inimigos’:


Escusado será dizer que o assassinato de OBL, caso tenha realmente acontecido (o que duvido como acima tentei explicar), será por certo ilegal à luz quer do Direito nos EUA quer do Direito internacional, ainda para mais quando hoje se sabe que o suposto OBL não ofereceu resistência que colocasse em perigo a vida dos SEAL uma vez que estava desarmado.

Mas mesmo que a história do seu assassinato seja uma fantasia, a verdade é
que tropas dos EUA levaram a cabo uma operação militar dentro de um país
soberano, Paquistão, sem que este tivesse sido informado, por certo será ilegal.

Eis alguns artigos recomendados sobre esta temática, recomendo especialmente o do jornal Spiegel o de Glen Greenwald do site Salon em que este escreve sobre a autorização dada por Obama, Extrajudicial killing, que permite o assassinato inclusive de cidadãos dos EUA sem que estes sejam previamente julgados num Tribunal civil ou mesmo militar.

Ainda que eu não seja propriamente grande adepto de Noam Chomsky que considero um gatekeeper, este tem sem dúvida um artigo sobre o tema que merece ser lido.

Outro artigo interessante também de Glen Greewald, traz-nos o Julgamento de Nuremberga e os crimes de guerra comparando com o que se vai passando com as diversas operações militares dos EUA.

Como já escrevi, desde a WWII que os EUA não declaram qualquer guerra,
chamam-lhes operações exactamente porque o Presidente não tem o poder de
declarar guerra, apenas o Congresso, o que nunca mais sucedeu desde a
II Guerra Mundial, apesar dos EUA estarem envolvidos em guerras
ininterruptamente desde essa altura.

Guernica / Noam Chomsky: My Reaction to Osama bin Laden’s Death

It’s increasingly clear that the operation was a planned assassination, multiply violating elementary norms of international law. There appears to have been no attempt to apprehend the unarmed victim, as presumably could have been done by 80 commandos facing virtually no
opposition—except, they claim, from his wife, who lunged towards them.
In societies that profess some respect for law, suspects are apprehended and brought to fair trial. I
stress “suspects.” In April 2002, the head of the FBI, Robert Mueller, informed the press that after the most intensive investigation in history, the FBI could say no more than that it “believed” that the plot was hatched in Afghanistan, though implemented in the UAE and Germany.
they only believed in April 2002, they obviously didn’t know 8 months earlier, when Washington dismissed tentative offers by the Taliban 
(how serious, we do not know, because they were instantly dismissed) to extradite bin Laden if they were presented with evidence—which, as we soon learned, Washington didn’t have. Thus Obama was simply lying when he said, in his White House statement, that “we quickly learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by al Qaeda.”

We might ask ourselves how we would be reacting if Iraqi commandos landed at George W. Bush’s compound, assassinated him, and dumped his body in the Atlantic. Uncontroversially, his crimes vastly exceed bin Laden’s, and he is not a “suspect” but uncontroversially the “decider” who gave the orders to commit the “supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole” (quoting the Nuremberg Tribunal) for which Nazi criminals were hanged: the hundreds of thousands of deaths, millions of refugees, destruction of much of the country, the bitter sectarian conflict that has now spread to the rest of the region.
Same with the name, Operation Geronimo. The imperial mentality is so profound, throughout western society, that no one can perceive that they are glorifying bin Laden by identifying him with courageous resistance against genocidal invaders. It’s
like naming our murder weapons after victims of our crimes: Apache, Tomahawk… It’s as if the Luftwaffe were to call its fighter planes “Jew” and “Gypsy.”

Confirmed: Obama authorizes assassination of U.S. citizen – Glenn Greenwald – Salon.com

In late January, I wrote about the Obama administration’s “presidential assassination program,” whereby American
citizens are targeted for killings far away from any battlefield, based exclusively on unchecked accusations by the Executive Branch that they’re involved in Terrorism.
At the time, The Washington Post’s Dana Priest had noted deep in a long article that Obama had continued Bush’s policy (which Bush never actually implemented) of having the Joint Chiefs of Staff compile “hit lists” of Americans,
and Priest suggested that the American-born Islamic cleric Anwar
al-Awlaki was on that list. The following week, Obama’s Director of
National Intelligence, Adm.
Dennis Blair, acknowledged in Congressional testimony that the administration reserves the “right” to carry out such assassinations.

The quaint and obsolete Nuremberg principles – Glenn Greenwald – Salon.com

Benjamin Ferencz is a 92-year-old naturalized U.S. citizen, American combat soldier during World War II, and a prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials, where he prosecuted numerous Nazi war criminals, including some responsible for the deaths of upward of 100,000 innocent people. He gave a fascinating (and shockingly articulate) 13-minute interview yesterday to the CBC in Canada about the bin Laden killing, the Nuremberg principles, and the U.S. role in the world.
All of Ferencz’s answers are thought-provoking — including his discussion of how the Nuremberg Principles apply to bin Laden — but there’s one answer he gave which I particularly want to highlight; it was in response to this question: “so what should we have learned from Nuremberg that we still haven’t learned”?  His answer (audio):

I’m afraid most of the lessons of Nuremberg have passed, unfortunately.  The world has accepted them, but the U.S. seems reluctant to do so.
The principal lesson we learned from Nuremberg is that a war of aggression — that means, a war in violation of international law, in violation of the UN charter, and not in self-defense — is the supreme international crime, because all the other crimes happen in war.  And every
leader who is responsible for planning and perpetrating that crime should be held to account in a court of law, and the law applies equally to everyone.

These lessons were hailed throughout the world — I hailed them, I was involved in them — and it saddens me to no end when Americans are asked:  why don’t you support the Nuremberg principles on aggression?  And the response
is:  Nuremberg?  That was then, this is now.  Forget it.

Justice, American Style: Was Bin Laden’s Killing Legal? – SPIEGEL ONLINE – News – International

Is this what justice looks like? Al-Qaida boss Osama bin Laden was killed on Sunday in a secret military operation in Pakistan. Americans are celebrating, but there are serious doubts about whether the targeted killing was legal under international law and the laws of war.
Claus Kress, an international law professor at the University of Cologne, argues that achieving retributive justice for crimes, difficult as that may be, is “not achieved through summary executions, but through a punishment that is meted out at the end of a trial.” Kress says the normal way of handling a man who is sought globally for
commissioning murder would be to arrest him, put him on trial and ultimately convict him.

In the context of international law, military force can be used in the
arrest of a suspect, and this may entail gun fire or situations of
self-defense that, in the end, leave no other possibility than to kill a
highly dangerous and highly suspicious person. These developments can also lead to tragic and inevitable escalations of the justice process.

In truth, it isn’t quite that simple. And not everything that the United States declares to be war really is. Legal experts like Kress say it is “questionable whether the USA can still claim to be engaged in an armed conflict with al-Qaida.”
And what business did the United States even have acting within the territory of Pakistan, a foreign power? A military strike that crosses national borders, barring acts of self-defense, is generally viewed as an infringement on sovereignty — unless Pakistan’s government requestedhelp from the Americans.

Powered by ScribeFire.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Junte-se a 66 outros seguidores